![]() ![]() This then is the period when the revolution would have happened if it was going to happen, for, according to E. At the one end political activity in Britain was much intensified as a result of the French Revolution, which inspired much adoration and some attempts at emulation: at the other end the ’48 revolutions abroad had parallel movements at home, and with their failure decades of intermittent depression and disturbance gave way to an era of domestic calm. These limits do seem meaningful for Britain as well as continental. When people seek, as they do seek for whatever reason, the period when Britain came nearest in modern times to experiencing revolution, they usually look at the years between the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 and the more widespread, though less important, uprisings that characterised the European scene in 1848. Yet unlike them, he endorsed imperial ascendancy in order to remove obstacles to global communications and spread civilization outside Europe. #Dupin slike free#Bowring upheld the same liberal ideals as Richard Cobden and other luminaries of the free trade movement. His career also helps to connect the rise of free trade ideas in Europe with the ‘imperialism of free trade’ in other parts of the world. He employed different strategies according to local political conditions, appealing to public opinion in liberal Western Europe, seeking to persuade bureaucrats and absolute rulers in Central Europe and the Middle East, and resorting to gunboats in East Asia. An early advocate of trade liberalization in Britain, Bowring promoted free trade policies in France, Italy, Germany, Egypt, Siam, and China between 18. John Bowring's career offers a different insight into the practical conditions that permitted a concept, free trade, to spread across national borders. The international diffusion of ideas has often been described as an abstract process. But his attention to social and economic issues prompts us to reexamine the category of “the social” and its uses in the history of liberal thought, particularly the place of class concerns in the French liberal tradition. The lens of usurpation ultimately limited the scope of Constant's solutions to poverty. By interpreting social issues through his original political lens of “usurpation,” Constant encouraged skepticism of social legislation and identified the political implications of a “disinherited” poor class. This article examines Constant's response to what would later become known as “the social question” in his Commentary on Filangieri's Work, and argues that his claims about poverty and its alleviation highlight central elements of his political liberalism, especially on the practice of citizenship in the modern age. The paper concludes by suggesting that Sismondi managed to transform Genevan republicanism into a set of ideas which has nourished economic radicalism up to the present.Īs part of Benjamin Constant's academic “revival,” scholars have revisited the political and religious elements of his thought, but conclude that he remained uninterested in the nineteenth century's major social and economic questions. The foci of interest are Sismondi's views on property, commercial wealth, work and leisure, division of labour, consumption and luxury, paper money and public credit, and citizenship. After a brief examination of De la richesse commerciale (1803), the third section of the paper is devoted to a close analysis of the Nouveaux principes. Sismondi's major historical work, the Histoire des républiques italiennes du Moyen Age (1807–1818), amounts to a tribute to the liberty and patriotism brought about by republican governments. ![]() He was in favour of a balanced constitution combined with public virtue. ![]() Deeply influenced by both Smith and Rousseau, Sismondi first expounded his republican creed in a political treatise, Recherches sur les constitutions des peuples libres (1797–1801). This paper reassesses Sismondi's Nouveaux principes d’économie politique (1819) by locating the origins of his unorthodox political economy in the republican tradition of thought. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |